As phenomenology of drawing a figure that I propose here, is antithetical to the intentions for which the argument itself is proposed, I think it is clearly necessary to put the idea of \u200b\u200b"tamarro.
Phenomenology, in this case, could provide data useful in research of epistemological character, not enough, obviously, but needed to go beyond the idea and can make an argument that can at least be able to make clear the problem.
The first question to ask, in fact, is this: Who is the tamarro?
We are all accustomed to seeing such a figure, although in my opinion it is one of the social realities more vague.
The element that most characterizes the tamarro is linked to violence, "vice / virtue (a virtue in the Aristotelian sense as close to the deadline, and then linked to the strength).
The only language that people can use in question is close to his gestures of 'physical aversion, a weapon to show the outside. The
little familiarity with the verbal language is closely linked with the 'physical energy, single sign-thinking of a spectacle with ease.
But this is actually semi-literate (even if unconsciously) wanted. What is the tamarro defends his anger he shows in fact a refusal to learn the language that is taxed in the school, since the primary.
Indeed, in some school situations, the lead tamarri respect for "repeating".
This clearly stems from a loving relationship with their families, where one breathes the exploitation, the anger of the oppressed, the struggle to make ends meet, poverty is not only economic but also spiritual and cultural, where the sensitivity has not opportunity to be educated as in the better-off.
You do not want to understand here that there are classes to ensure higher education. Rather, the education suffers tamarro still comes from above, and is pre-cognizzata because these parts of the flock, to carry out their duties. The tamarro often reflects the norm, understood as an idea sufficient to guarantee the exercise of his employment and entertainment within a predetermined rank, which formed a mass and for that consensus.
There is a destiny that he wants the social tamarro is ignorant, stupid, violent and cunning.
Michael Foucault explained the concept of biopolitics: that the power control system exerts on bodies, deciding on their own social emerged from positions in which they themselves are forced to work, at home etc.. The housing may rarely produce people who behave like someone who lives in the hills. The
tamarro is often a very carefree person, not exactly suffused with existential problems if you do not order material, linked to matters of survival. Does not arise because he has other questions to ask, and are clearly of vital importance and closer .. For this reason
tamarro is normal, or more precisely, it is assumed to be that he. This
his carelessness is distinguished by his clothing, sports often, comfortable, or even often consists of clothes close that highlight the physical well-groomed (value nature of war, where the military must have just a lot of resistance and strength, and enough but not too much brain). The tamarro not live but a close relationship with his own body sphere, although it may seem. He takes some specific actions and repeats them, mimicking a code that determines the respectability of that and then his own life in society. Inside the physical reality of such an individual, is the archive of so much social rage, of a secular nature.
The point is that this anger is not allowed to record, if not a direct expression of that which can occur through physical or verbal aggression reduced words in the vulgar content, and provision of a park very lexicon.
We know then that the properties of language constructs reality identity of each individual. The wickedness of
tamarro is true for its etymology (captivitas - prison) because he is the slave.
The site built just for the fun of tamarro is the nightclub, where he carries himself in the wars between males around for women with which to vent sexual needs, but often the pattern is more catholic in mind that in places frequented by other members other social groups. The music is repetitive, going to stimulate the lower parts of the body, so that these are urged to follow their animal instincts to the detriment of the most spiritually elevated. The nightclub is the culmination of education and for that of the manipulation exerted on biopolitics boys, forced to move in a certain way according to the rigor and discipline of the ghost that teaches them fascist. At
tamarro not allowed to communicate verbally with individuals of other social classes. It is as if there was an inexorable un'incomunicabilità due to separation, even an obvious parallel. If the tamarro would communicate with the son of a university professor, should learn his language, and thus give up their.
The point is that the anger of tamarro is inexplicable, except through a conscious rebellion that comes from himself. All revolutions have been theorized by classes that were not the most subordinate. In the midst of the flock of tamarri, there are certainly people that fate has marked the chance to wish to extricate themselves from their fatal position (without having him feel jealous of other "higher"). Desire is not stifling, and what does the reality of the era anti-initiation of consumption, where the extension of the company is his own portrait (see "Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord).
But if the average student, or even the intellectual, who want to define themselves as defenders of the oppressed classes, meet the tamarro always have a mixed reaction of disgust and fear. The fear stems from the awareness that life tamarro knows much better than they can do themselves (in addition to issues intimately animals), and disgust is the result of that education that will stand out each part of the social reality in its place, enabling the various theories that a certain need for humanistic always refer to a next and better world, and for that very abstract, moderate, unresolved. What in the
tamarro should cause disgust is' the same dress that he wears (both metaphorically or not). But by the same
anger that he brings with him is a sign of social urgency that will not identify (because the tamarro does not follow a specific fashion, he is part of the current) but to show its own truth, as evidence of what is life for those who live in the suburbs or in reality, however marginalized, where the only thing that should arouse disgust or not the sense of superiority, but the scandal of lives defuse why this is necessary to live in the corrupt world in which we rest our butts .
Luca Atzori
0 comments:
Post a Comment