The theoretical philosophy, as well as for is redesigned by Carlo Sini, should be half as good as given a universal science, and the other to detail.
According to the philosopher from Bologna, the problem of philosophy is that today it "think too much." What we still we are going to define as a "friend of wisdom" should evolve into an 'ethic of thought. " Indeed
after Heidegger is no longer possible to think of access to the 'universal' only through the vehicle's "special" which is housed in the language.
The very concept of "universal" in itself is special, indeed we would say that everything that can be considered accessible to consciousness, or the whole plan eidetic may be thought of as objective.
The human being tends to turn everything into an object, what is inoggettivabile, and this is his High Limit.
The food is cooked and seasoned, and eaten directly like other animals which occupy the floor of the 'intimate' s immanent (as Bataille would say in "The theory of religion").
For ethical thinking, therefore, means a new way to "live" thought, assuming that you can access it only through language.
Sometimes I imagine a sword that pierces the planet earth.
All the way live in the language. It's so that we have control over the tools that Rendola our own potential future, and so all our projects. Language is a more sophisticated form of objectification, that is the creation of a world "knowable" that acts as a reflection to the "noumenal", which knows no separation, transcendence, is a mirror that only shows itself.
When you go to meet "God" and consequently to the whole plan of imaginary entities (angels, unicorns, Donald, golden mountains, etc.) you must meet all 'unreality of the whole language, which we are shown how effectively all institutions to be imaginary. This is the meaning of the Met.
Rather than thinking in ethics, I believe that philosophy should rather evolve (or rather resolved) in Poetry.
In the name of God rests on the sense of language.
Luca Atzori
0 comments:
Post a Comment