"Perhaps only those who want s'infinita." Montale
Envy is certainly one of the sentiments that there are more philosophical.
It can be constructive or destructive.
In the second case we no longer speak of philosophy, but simply a feeling mediocre levels that extended to the wider becomes the fuel of the crap we are used to define policy.
It 's the case of those who can not get what he wants, he decides to destroy it, so as not to be forced to bear the weight of desire. Prejudice to the policy, we can take as an example the revolutionary (of the Right, as the Left) that is not happy with the state of things where you live decides to cancel it to implement a different but identical, thereby preserving the sad and ironic truth from which it is eternally parties.
In the first case, it is taken into consideration is the engine that leads to move towards knowledge.
If Aristotle said that the desire for knowledge creates wonder, envy is the wagon on which it moves to get there.
want, in this case, means an effort directed primarily to the change, the change himself. A removal must be followed, however, by timely return.
The philosopher is a prodigal son.
The only change that can occur in society can be made on an ontology.
The point is that manufacturing is not simple envy. If you live in a system that decides what we should want, become the object of envy there fake, because it does not have any bearing on what are the real needs of the individual.
It is therefore necessary that this individual before they become emancipated, primarily responsible.
Should not happen but no ontological change, you end up being in front of words and resolutions revolving around themselves. A power party closely linked to real issues and not rational, which can often pretend to wear an identity unbearable. This creates
more often the phenomenon of mass confusion of the individual with no existential orientation, more like a herd where everyone tries to occupy small spaces and makes attacking those nearby, in a desperate attempt to get possession of the word "excel".
doing this are shrinking the space as well as time.
The existence should follow that path subtly linked to the experience, more often is associated with the demands of quick consumption.
But this is a concern for the masses, and we do not care.
What should concern everyone closer, it is rather the attainment of knowledge that will make possible an improvement not only in the formal but also real.
This is not possible, however, gaining feelings of hatred, lazy and destructive temptations associated with, claimed that complex defects that are the source of other problems.
said this is necessary, of course, go in conflict with a normal act of overvaluation that is made in respect of having at the expense of being.
The point is that there should be no one to prove anything, and that, rather, since the human condition suggests that life moves over the wall filled with nothing that is freedom, and that there is other than the sovereign's death, it is worth listening to the live voice that whispers to us our duty, without seeking consent, but doing it for pure love (located outside), eliminating the illusion of a changing world that exists only within ourselves.
The rest are lies, and let the others envy (those who believe).
Luca Atzori
0 comments:
Post a Comment